An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (2025)

Summary#

Bill C-3, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (2025), would amend the federal Citizenship Act; it would not create a separate citizenship law. Its stated goal is to change who can gain or regain Canadian citizenship through a Canadian parent or adoptive parent. These are proposed changes: the bill would start on a day set by the Governor in Council, and the supplied material does not say when that would be.

  • It would extend citizenship by descent to people born outside Canada before the bill starts who meet the amended rules, including some people affected by the existing first-generation limit.
  • For people born outside Canada after it starts, the bill would keep a limit on passing citizenship beyond the first generation unless a citizen parent had been physically present in Canada for at least 1,095 days before the birth.
  • It would allow people adopted abroad before the bill starts by a Canadian citizen to be granted citizenship under section 5.1. For adoptions after it starts, a similar 1,095-day physical-presence test would apply in specified cases.
  • It would restore citizenship to people who lost it because they did not apply to retain it under former section 8, or whose application was not approved.
  • It would let regulations provide a simplified renunciation process for certain people who become citizens because of the bill. The bill does not set out that process.

What it means for you#

  • People born abroad to a Canadian parent: Some who were excluded by the first-generation limit could become citizens under the amended rules. For births after the bill starts, the 1,095-day test would limit citizenship by descent in specified cases. The bill also addresses some historical categories of citizenship.
  • People adopted abroad by a Canadian citizen: The bill would make some people adopted before it starts eligible for a citizenship grant under section 5.1. For specified adoptions after it starts, the Canadian adoptive parent must have been physically present in Canada for at least 1,095 days before the adoption. Eligibility for a grant is not the same as citizenship being automatic.
  • People who lost citizenship under former retention rules: The bill would restore citizenship for people covered by the amendments. It also provides for some people to renounce through a simplified process, but regulations would have to set out that process.
  • Other residents and businesses: The supplied text does not directly change taxes, fees, or other citizenship eligibility routes.

Money#

No cost information is in the available material.

  • The supplied bill text includes no cost estimate or appropriation.
  • The cost of processing citizenship claims or renunciations is not stated.

What is unclear#

  • The bill does not give a start date; that would be set later by the Governor in Council.
  • The detailed rules for the simplified renunciation process are not in the bill.
  • The material does not explain how people would prove 1,095 days of physical presence or how citizenship claims would be handled.
  • Some provisions depend on detailed historical categories and exceptions; the supplied material does not explain how they apply to individual cases.
  • The current Citizenship Act was not supplied, so I could not verify how the proposed changes compare with the law now in force.

Case for#

  • The bill appears intended to address cases where people born abroad were excluded from citizenship because of limits on passing citizenship to later generations.
  • Restoring citizenship for people affected by former retention rules could remedy losses tied to not applying, or to an application not being approved.
  • Requiring 1,095 days of physical presence in Canada before certain later-generation births or adoptions could be seen as linking citizenship by descent to a parent’s connection with Canada.
  • Allowing a simplified renunciation process for some newly recognized citizens acknowledges that some may not want to keep citizenship.

Case against#

  • The bill could extend citizenship to people born abroad who have little direct connection to Canada; the physical-presence test applies only in specified cases.
  • The bill does not explain how the 1,095-day requirement would be proved or how claims would be decided.
  • A citizenship grant for an adopted person is not automatic, and the supplied material does not set out the process or timelines.
  • The bill leaves the simplified renunciation process to regulations, so its conditions and practical effect are not clear from the bill.
Loading versions…Read this official publication

Summary matches the latest captured text

Summary version: Royal Assent · 2025-11-20

Last source check:

Read the latest official text

How the text changed

Loading versions…

Votes

Division 47 · Agreed To · November 5, 2025

For (52%)
Against (48%)

Division 36 · Agreed To · September 22, 2025

For (56%)
Against (41%)
Paired (3%)

Division 44 · Agreed To · November 3, 2025

For (51%)
Against (49%)
Paired (1%)

Division 45 · Agreed To · November 3, 2025

For (51%)
Against (49%)
Paired (1%)