City to review police practices on violence

Summary#

Montréal city council unanimously adopted a declaration reaffirming the City’s commitment to fighting femicides and intimate partner violence. It mandates the Commission de la sécurité publique (Public Security Commission) to review SPVM practices, hold a public consultation and assess whether an approach used in Montréal-Nord could be extended to all boroughs. The declaration’s stated goal is to strengthen prevention and protection; it does not itself create shelter spaces or provide funding.

  • The Commission must take stock of SPVM practices on intimate partner violence and femicides to better equip and support police officers.
  • The Commission must consult community organizations, women’s shelters and relevant consultation groups, and assess the feasibility of extending to all boroughs an approach inspired by the Plan d’action collectif en violence conjugale de Montréal-Nord.
  • The City formally asks the Québec government to fund new shelter spaces for women experiencing intimate partner violence, beyond amounts already announced to support existing shelters.

What it means for you#

  • Residents: The resolution condemns femicides and recognizes gender-based violence as systemic. It does not directly change residents’ rights or services.
  • Police and community organizations: The Commission must review SPVM practices and hold a public consultation involving community organizations, shelters and relevant consultation groups. The resolution sets no timetable or consultation process.
  • Women seeking shelter: The City is asking Québec to fund new places, but the resolution does not create places or guarantee access to shelter.

Money#

No publicly available information on the cost of the Commission’s work or any new funding.

  • The resolution asks the Québec government—not the City, in this decision—to fund new shelter spaces. It does not set an amount or commit funding.

What is unclear#

  • When the review and consultation will happen, and whether the Commission must publish its findings.
  • What specific practices the SPVM review will cover, and how the consultation will shape it.
  • What would count as feasible when assessing whether to extend the Montréal-Nord-inspired approach to every borough.

Case for#

  • The resolution says more than half of requests for shelter made to SOS Violence conjugale cannot be met because places are unavailable. Asking Québec to fund new spaces directly addresses that stated shortage.
  • Reviewing police practices and consulting organizations and shelters could help identify ways to better support officers and people affected by violence.
  • Assessing an existing Montréal-Nord-inspired approach before extending it could inform whether broader use is feasible.

Case against#

  • The resolution does not itself add shelter spaces, provide money or require Québec to fund them.
  • The review and consultation have no stated deadline, reporting requirement or required outcome.
  • The resolution calls for an assessment of whether the approach can be extended, not for its extension.