City backs $10.25M social housing plan

Summary#

Montréal city council unanimously adopted an orientation on financial support for Communia’s prefabricated social-housing project at 2055 Elmhurst Street in Côte-des-Neiges–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce borough. The orientation is to provide up to $2,000,000, approve an agreement for that support, and have the city prepare an agreement for a further contribution of up to $8,250,000. The stated goal is to help build transitional housing for people at risk of or experiencing homelessness. The agglomeration council makes the final decision at a later meeting.

  • The proposed $2,000,000 contribution would be paid under an agreement between the city and Communia.
  • The city’s housing strategy and real-estate service must prepare a separate agreement setting conditions for a possible contribution of up to $8,250,000.
  • If that further contribution is approved, the city’s total contribution could reach $10,250,000.
  • City staff say the project is planned to provide 50 transitional homes, with delivery expected in February 2027.

What it means for you#

  • People at risk of or experiencing homelessness: The planned project is intended for this group. This decision does not set an application process, eligibility rules, or how homes will be assigned.
  • Taxpayers: The city council’s orientation includes a proposed contribution from the city budget. It does not itself make the final funding decision.
  • Communia: The organization would receive the proposed funding if the required decisions and agreement proceed. City staff say the site is owned by the Société d’habitation du Québec and is to be transferred to Communia without payment.

Money#

The city council’s position includes a one-time contribution of up to $2,000,000; a further contribution of up to $8,250,000 is being prepared but is not approved by this resolution.

  • The $2,000,000 would come from the operating budget of the city’s Service de la stratégie immobilière et de l’habitation. The first payment is expected in 2026; a second payment depends on progress and the agreement’s conditions.
  • City staff say the contribution may be reduced if the project’s financing plan changes or other funding becomes available.
  • The materials give no cost estimate for the project as a whole.

What is unclear#

  • The agreement’s detailed conditions and payment terms are not included.
  • The decision does not set the terms for the possible $8,250,000 contribution or say when it would be paid.
  • The materials do not explain how residents will apply for the homes or how eligibility and placement will be decided.

Case for#

  • City staff say the project supports the city’s homelessness strategy and would provide 50 transitional homes for people at risk of or experiencing homelessness.
  • City staff say the first contribution could help the project start quickly and cover early contractor payments and related costs.
  • The city’s proposed contribution could be lower if other funding becomes available.

Case against#

  • One concern is that the full city contribution could reach $10,250,000, while the project’s total cost and final funding plan are not given.
  • The conditions for the first contribution, and the terms of the possible second contribution, are not set out in the materials.
  • It is unclear how the homes will be assigned to eligible people.