National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act

Summary#

Bill C-241, the National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act, would create a new Act; it does not amend an existing Act. If it became law, the Minister of the Environment would have to develop a national strategy with four other federal ministers. Its stated goal is to help key stakeholders get information they need to forecast floods and droughts.

  • The Environment Minister would have to consult provincial and municipal government representatives, Indigenous governing bodies and other relevant groups, including universities, civil society organizations and industry.
  • The strategy would have to assess the need for national coordination, investment, new technology and modelling, and assess opportunities for national forecasting, including current and future flood-plain mapping.
  • The strategy would have to set out possible federal measures in response to those assessments. These could include preparing a proposal for a cooperative national forecasting service, but the bill would not require that service to be established.
  • Within two years after the Act comes into force, the Minister would have to report the strategy to Parliament and publish it online. Within five years after that report is tabled, the Minister would have to report on the strategy’s effectiveness and publish that report too.

What it means for you#

  • Federal government: The Environment Minister would lead the work, in collaboration with the ministers responsible for agriculture, infrastructure, natural resources and public safety. The Minister would have to consult the listed groups and meet the reporting deadlines.
  • Provinces, municipalities, Indigenous communities, universities, civil society and industry: Their representatives would have to be consulted while the strategy is developed. The bill does not give them a decision-making role or guarantee any particular service or outcome.
  • Farmers, insurers and the public: The bill would not directly change flood warnings, insurance, flood-plain rules or emergency services. It would require assessments and a strategy, not a new forecasting service or a right to forecasts.

Money#

No cost information is in the available material.

  • The bill would require federal ministers to develop the strategy, consult, and prepare and publish reports, but it gives no cost estimate or staffing plan.
  • It would require an assessment of the need for new investment; it does not itself provide funding for a forecasting service.

What is unclear#

  • The supplied text does not state the bill’s parliamentary status or when it would come into force. The deadlines would run from the date it comes into force.
  • The bill does not set out how consultations must work, who counts as an “other relevant stakeholder,” or how the Minister would weigh different views.
  • It does not require the government to act on the assessments or establish the proposed forecasting service.
  • It does not set out the service’s possible coverage, funding, operator, data-sharing rules or how it would fit with existing forecasting. The supplied material does not establish the current arrangements.

Case for#

  • Floods and droughts can affect communities and industries across provincial boundaries. A national strategy could assess whether better coordination would help meet information needs.
  • The bill requires the government to examine modelling, technology and investment needs before deciding what federal measures may make sense.
  • Consultation and public reports could make the assessment more informed and let Parliament and the public see the Minister’s conclusions.

Case against#

  • The bill requires a strategy and assessments, but does not require a forecasting service, new investment or any other specific response. The practical result could therefore be limited.
  • It sets no standards for forecast accuracy, geographic coverage or how quickly useful information must be provided.
  • The bill does not specify funding, staffing or how federal work would coordinate with existing provincial efforts. Those details could affect whether its goal is achieved.
Loading versions…Read this official publication

Summary matches the latest captured text

Summary version: As amended by committee · 2026-06-17

Last source check:

Read the latest official text

How the text changed

Loading versions…

Votes

Division 52 · Agreed To · December 3, 2025

For (91%)
Against (7%)
Paired (2%)