New Law Tightens Control Over Schools

Full Title:
Bill 101, Putting Student Achievement First Act, 2026

Summary#

Bill 101 makes wide changes to Ontario’s child care, K–12 education, teacher training, and school board labour relations laws. It gives the Minister of Education more direct control over student assessment, school board finances, communications, construction projects, and bargaining representation. It also sets up the winding down and later dissolution of the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO). The stated goal is to focus on student achievement and tighter oversight.

Key changes:

  • Lets parents request an Ontario Education Number (OEN) for children in licensed child care; expands the Minister’s ability to assign OENs earlier.
  • Requires school boards to follow new Minister-set policies on student assessment, expense rules, use of educational materials (including digital), and public communications.
  • Removes the requirement for school climate surveys.
  • Requires Minister approval before boards buy or expropriate land and expands Minister control over school building additions, renovations, and repairs, including power to take over a project if a board is not following policy.
  • Limits lawsuits against the Crown and certain officials for actions taken in good faith under these powers; boards can be made to pay costs of appointed project managers.
  • Changes English-language boards’ leadership: directors of education are the chief executive officers; boards need Minister approval to dismiss a director; directors must appoint a chief education officer.
  • Replaces OPSBA and OCSTA as employer bargaining agents for English public and separate boards with the Council of Ontario Directors of Education (CODE), with a new internal committee and strong Minister regulation powers; keeps a role for OCSTA to flag denominational-rights issues.
  • Strengthens provincial control over accreditation rules for initial teacher education programs, which prevail over university senate decisions.
  • Starts the process to wind up and later dissolve HEQCO, transferring its assets and obligations to the province.

What it means for you#

  • Parents of young children

    • You can ask the Minister to assign an OEN to your child if they are in licensed child care or certain early-years programs. This could mean children have a consistent education number before entering school.
    • The Ministry can provide added support services to child care operators and local system managers.
  • Students and parents (K–12)

    • Student assessment will follow province-wide policies set by the Minister. This could change how grades, exams, or evaluations are designed and used.
    • Schools must follow policies on approved learning materials, including digital textbooks.
    • School climate surveys are no longer required by law.
  • Teachers, teacher candidates, and faculties of education

    • Accreditation rules for initial teacher education programs can set program length, required areas of study, delivery, and practicum time. These rules apply even if a university senate would decide otherwise.
    • Accreditation of ongoing education for teachers is handled under a separate authority.
  • School boards, trustees, and board staff

    • You must follow Minister policies on expense claims (travel, meals, hospitality, discretionary spending, memberships). Some expenses may be prohibited or restricted.
    • Public communications by the board, its members (when acting for the board), officers, and employees must follow Minister-set policies.
    • The number of elected trustees will be set by regulation within a range of 5 to 12.
    • Minister approval is required before buying or expropriating land. Minister policies and approvals can also apply to additions, renovations, improvements, and repairs of buildings. The Minister can appoint someone to manage a project and require the board to pay their fees.
    • During certain “vesting orders” (a legal step where the Minister takes control due to a public-interest threat), lawsuits and court orders against the board may be paused or need Minister leave, and the Minister can amend or cancel some board agreements and control board funds.
    • Boards may be required to get Minister approval of their annual budgets in prescribed cases and to follow conditions set by the Minister.
    • The Minister can prohibit using some revenues for specified purposes.
    • English-language boards: the director of education is the chief executive officer (CEO); boards cannot dismiss the director without prior written Minister approval. The director must appoint a chief education officer (with set qualifications). Some board resolutions may need confirmation by the chair, director, or another official to take effect (by regulation).
  • Unions and bargaining parties in the school sector

    • CODE becomes the employer bargaining agency for English public and separate boards and section 68 boards. A CODE committee will direct bargaining, and its processes can be set by regulation or by-law (voting may not be required).
    • If CODE is unable or unwilling to act, the Minister can designate another person or body to act in its place.
    • OCSTA may observe central bargaining involving separate boards and can trigger a review to move certain matters to local bargaining if denominational rights may be affected. Separate boards may be required by regulation to pay fees to OCSTA.
    • Transition orders can transfer contracts, funds, information, and ongoing proceedings from OPSBA/OCSTA to CODE.
  • Postsecondary and HEQCO

    • HEQCO will be wound up and later dissolved by order, with assets and obligations moved to the province or an agency. The Minister will prepare HEQCO’s final annual report. The bill does not say what body, if any, replaces HEQCO’s functions.
    • Universities running teacher education programs must follow provincial accreditation requirements even if these conflict with university academic governance.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Possible impacts:

  • School boards may face new administrative and compliance costs to meet Minister approvals, follow new policies, confirm board resolutions, and adjust expense practices.
  • Boards could be required to pay fees and expenses for Minister-appointed project managers on construction or renovation projects.
  • Government may incur costs to oversee capital approvals, manage vesting orders, develop and enforce policies, wind up HEQCO, and administer the transition to CODE.
  • Separate school boards may be required by regulation to pay fees to OCSTA related to its activities under the Act.
  • Child care and early years programs and the Ministry may need system changes to support earlier OEN assignment.
  • No dollar estimates are provided in the bill text.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to standardize student assessment and classroom materials to improve consistency and achievement across the province.
  • Stronger rules for board expenses and public communications could be seen as improving accountability and public trust.
  • Requiring Minister approvals and policies for land purchases and school construction may help control costs, reduce delays, and ensure projects meet provincial priorities; the takeover power provides a backstop if boards do not follow policy.
  • Earlier OEN assignment could support smoother transitions from child care to school and better continuity of student information.
  • Clarifying leadership in English-language boards (director as CEO, required qualifications for a chief education officer) could improve governance and responsibility.
  • Moving employer bargaining to CODE and enabling ministerial direction could streamline negotiations and align labour relations with system-wide goals; the OCSTA mechanism aims to protect denominational rights in separate schools.
  • Stronger provincial control over teacher education accreditation could ensure new teachers are prepared in required areas and program quality is consistent.
  • Winding up HEQCO and transferring its assets and obligations to the province could reduce duplication and centralize quality and accountability functions.

Opponents' View#

  • A possible concern is significant centralization of power in the Minister, which may reduce local board autonomy over budgeting, communications, facilities, and leadership decisions (including needing approval to dismiss a director).
  • Removing school climate surveys eliminates a province-wide tool for tracking student, staff, and parent perceptions of safety and well-being; the bill does not provide an alternative.
  • Giving the Minister authority to manage or direct school construction projects, require sale of property, and bar most legal proceedings related to these actions may raise accountability and fairness questions; legal immunity and limits on lawsuits reduce avenues for redress (judicial review remains).
  • Replacing OPSBA/OCSTA with CODE as the employer bargaining agency and allowing non-voting or altered voting processes could sideline elected trustees and disrupt ongoing labour relations during the transition.
  • Extending OEN assignment into early years programs could raise privacy and data-governance questions; the bill does not detail safeguards beyond existing law.
  • Provincial accreditation rules for teacher education that override university senate decisions may raise concerns about academic freedom and institutional self-governance.
  • Requiring Minister approval for land purchases and expanded approvals for repairs and renovations could slow needed school facility work if approvals take time.
  • Winding down and dissolving HEQCO removes an arm’s-length body; the bill does not explain how its research or quality-assurance functions will continue.