Summary#
H. Res. 1638 is a House resolution, not a bill that creates or amends a law. If adopted, it would have the House honor United Baptist Church’s 100 years of work in Akron and nearby communities, recognize its contributions, and encourage it to continue that work; these are statements of recognition and support, not guaranteed outcomes.
- The House would formally commemorate the church’s centennial.
- The House would recognize the church’s work in civil justice, economic development, and faith-based community building.
- The House would encourage the church to continue supporting Akron and surrounding communities.
- The resolution describes the church’s history and community activities, including food assistance, education, health initiatives, scholarships, tutoring, and workforce preparation.
What it means for you#
- United Baptist Church and the people it serves: If the House adopts the resolution, it would receive formal recognition from the House. The resolution does not require the church to continue any activity or provide it with a grant or other benefit.
- Residents and taxpayers: The resolution does not change anyone’s rights, services, taxes, or legal duties.
- General public: The resolution is still in progress and has been referred to a House committee. It has not yet been adopted.
Money#
No publicly available information on cost is provided in the available material.
- The resolution does not appropriate money, set a fee, or establish a funded program.
- It does not state whether any administrative costs would arise.
What is unclear#
- The resolution does not say when or whether the House will take further action.
- Its historical statements are recitals in the resolution; the supplied material does not provide separate sources verifying them.
- The resolution does not specify any action beyond the House’s recognition and encouragement.
Case for#
- The resolution would formally recognize a church whose described work includes community services, education, health initiatives, and scholarships.
- A possible argument for the resolution is that public recognition can mark the church’s centennial and acknowledge its stated role in the community.
- The text makes no new program or legal requirement; its method is recognition and encouragement.
Case against#
- The resolution does not provide funding or require any action, so it does not itself expand the church’s services or address community needs.
- One concern is that the resolution’s recognition may have little practical effect beyond the House’s statement.
- The historical and service claims are included in the resolution, but the supplied material does not provide independent verification.